Re: A minor update: Duccio Macchetto will try to figure out what proprietary period is appropriate for both proposals.

• Previous message: Saul Perlmutter: "A minor update: Duccio Macchetto will try to figure out what proprietary period is appropriate for both proposals."
• In reply to: Saul Perlmutter: "A minor update: Duccio Macchetto will try to figure out what proprietary period is appropriate for both proposals."
• Next in thread: Vitaliy Fadeyev: "Re: A minor update: Duccio Macchetto will try to figure out whatproprietary period is appropriate for both proposals."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 08:40:57AM -0800, Saul Perlmutter wrote:
> (Does anybody have any particularly clever simple argument about why
> it's now more appropriate to be the standard 1-year proprietary period
> as opposed to the zero-proprietary-period we proposed?)

Adam Riess is a shark.

-Rob

-- 
--Prof. Robert Knop
  Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
  robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu

• Next message: Vitaliy Fadeyev: "Re: A minor update: Duccio Macchetto will try to figure out whatproprietary period is appropriate for both proposals."
• Previous message: Saul Perlmutter: "A minor update: Duccio Macchetto will try to figure out what proprietary period is appropriate for both proposals."
• In reply to: Saul Perlmutter: "A minor update: Duccio Macchetto will try to figure out what proprietary period is appropriate for both proposals."
• Next in thread: Vitaliy Fadeyev: "Re: A minor update: Duccio Macchetto will try to figure out whatproprietary period is appropriate for both proposals."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Apr 02 2004 - 08:46:29 PST