A minor update: Duccio Macchetto will try to figure out what proprietary period is appropriate for both proposals.

From: Saul Perlmutter (saul@lbl.gov)
Date: Fri Apr 02 2004 - 08:40:57 PST

  • Next message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Re: A minor update: Duccio Macchetto will try to figure out what proprietary period is appropriate for both proposals."

    Here's a minor update: I finally reached Duccio Macchetto on the
    phone. I reminded him that there was the leftover issue -- what was the
    proprietary period -- that hadn't been specified last spring when these
    programs were reconfigured and shared between us and Adam last spring.
    He said he will try to figure out what proprietary period is
    appropriate. He seemed to agree that it should be the same for both
    proposals, but his first thought was that perhaps it should be the
    shorter of the proposed proprietary periods.

    (Does anybody have any particularly clever simple argument about why
    it's now more appropriate to be the standard 1-year proprietary period
    as opposed to the zero-proprietary-period we proposed?)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Apr 02 2004 - 08:40:59 PST