From: Rachel G. (gibbo@panisse.lbl.gov)
Date: Wed Mar 31 2004 - 16:11:07 PST
An excerpt from an e-mail I sent yesterday :
"We should make sure the subtractions (Feb search) show
Sedna. This is a clear event with an IAU designation
(2003ba). Loki on the other hand, does not have one - if
what the figures shown on the web page is correct, there
ain't much there."
From the GOODS transient page :
LOKI n2z26_2290_3570 SN 2003N 12:37:09.06 62:11:00.7 25.9+/-0.3 increasing
Notice the SN designation is not an IAU number.
Someone could check their circular if they wanted.
Also see :
http://www.stsci.edu/science/goods/transients/loki.html
I didn't expect this event to be found. I will put this
sort of info on the wiki from now on, and this is a good
example of why it's useful if we use it!
ALSO, scanners should be doing some of this research
themselves...
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:
> LOKI -- there's nothing there. I saved what looked like the nearest
> fluctuation that could be the candidate, but it wasn't found by our
> search software. I think this isn't a real event. At some point we
> should go back to the original images and see if something got
> eliminated by the CR cleaning.
>
> ELVIS -- this was off of the edge of the reference in the subtaraction,
> and so got missed. This won't be a problem during the search because
> the references will always be a bit bigger than the actual search
> images.
>
> -Rob
>
> --
> --Prof. Robert Knop
> Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
> robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Mar 31 2004 - 16:11:28 PST