From: Rachel G. (gibbo@plearn.lbl.gov)
Date: Mon Mar 08 2004 - 07:42:12 PST
Very good. Thanks, Bill.
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, William Januszewski wrote:
> Hi Rachel,
>
> The special requirement for singles, and specifying a spacific guide star pair,
> only needs to be place on the first exposure in a visit. Even if the visit was 5
> orbits long it would continue to use the star(s) specified assuming the guide
> star acqs were normal.
>
> Cheers,
> Bill
>
> >
> >Hi Bill,
> >
> > I've reviewed the Phase II you sent and all looks
> >good... although I did notice for the visits in which you've
> >specified single guide stars, that the F775W exposure
> >doesn't also contain this spec. Since it is the 2nd
> >exposure in the series (same pointing, orient, and occuring
> >during the same orbit) I assume it would be redundant to
> >respecify the guide star, and the same one will continue to
> >be used as long as it worked the first time. Is this
> >correct?
> >
> >Rachel
> >
> >---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:19:49 -0800 (PST)
> >From: Rachel G. <gibbo@jimbean.lbl.gov>
> >Reply-To: Rachel G. <ragibbons@lbl.gov>
> >To: William Januszewski <williamj@stsci.edu>
> >Subject: Re: 9727, plan windows
> >
> >
> >Hi Bill,
> >
> > I will review the Phase II and get back to you in a
> >day or two.
> >
> >Many, many, thanks!
> >
> >Rachel
> >
> >On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, William Januszewski wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi Rachel,
> >>
> >> Right after I sent the last email I noticed the plan windows for the visits
> had
> >> not been updated yet. All the visits are set to execute between April 1 and 4
> >> even though the last email didn't look that way.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Bill
> >>
> >> PS, I've attached the latest version of the phase 2 that I have, so you have
> it
> >> now too. :)
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Mar 10 2004 - 14:17:31 PST