From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Thu Dec 04 2003 - 17:28:18 PST
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:26:28PM -0800, Tony Spadafora wrote:
> Looks reasonable, except the point at :
> >>>+15 days ACS ~2 orbits March 3 (=4.063)
>
> is during the 2nd week of the black out, when only "a few SAA-impacted
> orbits would be accepted". I assume we would not want use that but
> would instead move this point to the first post-blackout date, Mar 8.
...except that we need to see how this fits with the follow-up cadence
that we've worked out, and how it would need to be modified.
-Rob
-- --Prof. Robert Knop Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 04 2003 - 17:28:31 PST