Re: lightcurve simulations - 24 Oct meeting

From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Fri Oct 24 2003 - 14:18:25 PDT

Next message: Vitaliy Fadeyev: "S/N for NICMOS"

Previous message: Tony Spadafora: "Re: lightcurve simulations - 24 Oct meeting"
In reply to: Tony Spadafora: "Re: lightcurve simulations - 24 Oct meeting"
Next in thread: Vallery Stanishev: "lightcurve simulations"
Next in thread: Vitaliy Fadeyev: "S/N for NICMOS"
Reply: Vallery Stanishev: "lightcurve simulations"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 02:08:34PM -0700, Tony Spadafora wrote:
> In his paper, Adam says "within 6 to 18 hrs after a repeat visit of the
> CDFS or HDFN, each GOODS epoch was differenced with the preceding epoch..."

Sounds good. So long as we make sure we can get the data on that
timescale, by two days after that we should be able to make a decision.
I'll just pull all-nighters on the days when we have subtractions to do,
so that we can be scanning the next morning. (Or, if they're spaced
over days, I'll just cope as necessary.)

-Rob

-- 
--Prof. Robert Knop
  Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
  robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu

Next message: Vitaliy Fadeyev: "S/N for NICMOS"
Previous message: Tony Spadafora: "Re: lightcurve simulations - 24 Oct meeting"
In reply to: Tony Spadafora: "Re: lightcurve simulations - 24 Oct meeting"
Next in thread: Vallery Stanishev: "lightcurve simulations"
Next in thread: Vitaliy Fadeyev: "S/N for NICMOS"
Reply: Vallery Stanishev: "lightcurve simulations"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 24 2003 - 14:18:39 PDT