From: Tony Spadafora (alspadafora@lbl.gov)
Date: Fri Oct 24 2003 - 14:08:34 PDT
In his paper, Adam says "within 6 to 18 hrs after a repeat visit of the
CDFS or HDFN, each GOODS epoch was differenced with the preceding epoch..."
-Tony
"Robert A. Knop Jr." wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:57:25AM -0700, Tony Spadafora wrote:
> > Rob - is the following assumed three day turn-around from search
> > observation to decision reasonable?
>
> I *think* so. Rachel-- do you know how fast we'll be able to get the
> data from HST? Can you look into that? If we can get the data within
> 12 hours of it being taken, then, yes, three-day turn around from search
> to decision should be reasonable.
>
> Also, while getting the RPS2 in is highest priority, if you can get the
> search data from last year over here in the same format we'll be getting
> it during the search this year, I can start figuring out the pipeline
> for getting that data into our database and to the subtractions.
>
> -Rob
>
> --
> --Prof. Robert Knop
> Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
> robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
-- Tony Spadafora ALSpadafora@lbl.gov Physics Division Tel: (510) 495-2316 Lawrence Berkeley National Lab FAX: (510) 486-6738 1 Cyclotron Road BLDG 50R5032 Berkeley, CA 94720-8160
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 24 2003 - 14:08:44 PDT