From: Reynald Pain (Reynald.Pain@in2p3.fr)
Date: Fri Jul 11 2003 - 01:35:13 PDT
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Saul Perlmutter wrote:
> If we can make it look nice, then we should try to plot both the full
> hubble diagram, and the residual plots (as we did in P99), but now both
> binned and un-binned. These will be the plots that everybody will use
> in text books and in talks, and I think we have to offer it to them in a
> few alternative forms (since otherwise they will take the plot from the
> other group!).
>
I agree with that and also with Greg's suggestion to have the plots linear
in z (I find it nicer than having zooms); and labelled with "SCP 2003"
page 6, paragraph 1 : add "high-redshift" in "provide a high-precision
{\it new} set of high-redshift supernovae to test the ...."
Reynald
>
>
>
> Greg Aldering wrote:
>
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > The dz = 0.05 binning looks pretty nice. I don't think the dz = 0.01
> > is useful. However, I would like to see dz = 0.1
> >
> > Also, I think there is merit in showing the full redshift range, but
> > then the cosmologies are not well separated on the scale of the plot.
> > Should we consider plotting binned residuals instead? Riess plots
> > the residuals wrt an OM=0, OL=0 universe, for example.
> >
> > - Greg
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 11 2003 - 01:14:24 PDT