Re: comments on SC3

From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Wed May 21 2003 - 10:36:51 PDT

  • Next message: Greg Aldering: "d(R-I) cut"

    On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 10:35:22AM -0700, Greg Aldering wrote:
    >
    > >On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 11:48:41PM -0700, Greg Aldering wrote:
    > >> p34 : The beginning of section 5.5 has to be reconciled with our
    > >> current extinction treatment.
    > >
    > >How so? I guess I don't understand how it's inconsistent now.
    >
    > In section 4.1, if you cut out the sentances called-out by Saul, "The
    > most reddened ... " then section 5.5 refers to text that will have been
    > cut. I agree with Saul that the discussion about overcorrection
    > doesn't belong in section 4.1. If you move that discussion earlier in
    > the paper (where you cut the reddest objects), then in section 5.5 you
    > can refer to that discussion.

    Ah. I understand. I thought you meant data treatment, as opposed to
    text treatment. Yes, that change has already been made.

    -Rob 

    -- 
--Prof. Robert Knop
  Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
  robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed May 21 2003 - 10:36:52 PDT