From: Greg Aldering (aldering@panisse.lbl.gov)
Date: Wed May 21 2003 - 10:35:22 PDT
>On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 11:48:41PM -0700, Greg Aldering wrote:
>> p34 : The beginning of section 5.5 has to be reconciled with our
>> current extinction treatment.
>
>How so? I guess I don't understand how it's inconsistent now.
In section 4.1, if you cut out the sentances called-out by Saul, "The
most reddened ... " then section 5.5 refers to text that will have been
cut. I agree with Saul that the discussion about overcorrection
doesn't belong in section 4.1. If you move that discussion earlier in
the paper (where you cut the reddest objects), then in section 5.5 you
can refer to that discussion.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed May 21 2003 - 10:35:23 PDT