Re: revised f(Om,w)

From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Fri May 16 2003 - 05:26:46 PDT

  • Next message: Greg Aldering: "E(B-V) vs stretch"

    On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 12:58:17AM -0700, Greg Aldering wrote:

    > One important note is that in Eric's code, the difference in Om at
    > the survey redshift is already accounted for. So, you don't need to
    > apply equation 4 of the HST paper. This is because Eric's code
    > calculates f(z=0.15) given Om(z=0) and w (the latter being constant).

    Just to make sure I'm clear:

    The three columns are

      w Omega_M f

    where Omega_M is the usual Omega_M at z=0. Correct? I plan to assume
    this when using the code, although at this point I think I'll recognize
    the z=0.15 difference by how the thing looks when I plot it up.

    -Rob 

    -- 
--Prof. Robert Knop
  Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
  robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri May 16 2003 - 05:26:48 PDT