From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Thu May 15 2003 - 15:21:28 PDT
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 03:17:21PM -0700, Greg Aldering wrote:
> Basically the OM(z=0.15) that we were using came from a calculation
> relating OM with f, where f comes from the logrithimic derivative of
> the growth of structure in the universe. Hawkins et al used an
> approximation (their eq 22) which does not account for w. Eric and I
> fixed that.
Ah, OK. Same measurment, now done right.
> The table I sent is the value of f for any given OM in a flat
> universe. In the context of the Hawkins et al result, in relates f
> measured at z=0.15 with OM at redshift 0.15. So, you still need to
> correct from OM at z=0.15 to OM at z=0.
Doh -- OK, I'll code that in. That will probably "help", in that it
will tend to move things to the left.
-Rob
-- --Prof. Robert Knop Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 15 2003 - 15:21:30 PDT