Re: Some more on GL systematics.

From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Sat May 03 2003 - 10:53:02 PDT

Next message: Greg Aldering: "Re: Some more on GL systematics."

Previous message: Greg Aldering: "additional edits"
Next in thread: Greg Aldering: "Re: Some more on GL systematics."
Maybe reply: Greg Aldering: "Re: Some more on GL systematics."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 09:27:14PM +0200, Ariel Goobar wrote:
> <w> = -0.92 +-0.1 <\Omega_M> = 0.25 +- 0.06

Did that start at w=-1? If so, then this 0.08 shift will by far be the
largest systematic uncertainty in w.

-Rob

-- 
--Prof. Robert Knop
  Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
  robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu

Next message: Greg Aldering: "Re: Some more on GL systematics."
Previous message: Greg Aldering: "additional edits"
Next in thread: Greg Aldering: "Re: Some more on GL systematics."
Maybe reply: Greg Aldering: "Re: Some more on GL systematics."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 03 2003 - 10:53:07 PDT