Re: Evolution paper

From: Gabriele Garavini (garavini@in2p3.fr)
Date: Wed Nov 17 2004 - 00:53:01 PST

  • Next message: Smith, Eric Adam: "Re: Evolution paper"

    Hi Rob,

    I'm sure you get systematics if you bin for doing the measurements of EW
    (though I'm not sure about how big they might be),
    and this is found also by Isobels student that is working on the Gimini
    data. However, Gaston (who did the measurements) I believe did not bin
    the data.

    Cheers
    Gabriele

    On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:

    > Hi -- can Eric Smith be added to the evolution@panisse.lbl.gov mailinb
    > list? (eric.a.smith@vanderbilt.edu)
    >
    > He's been doing some work on the equivalent width stuff for the Keck and
    > ESO 1998 spectra. Obviously this relates intimately to Gabriele's work;
    > he has been comparing his stuff with what was the draft of Gabriele's
    > paper posted as of a month or so ago.
    >
    > Among other things, he's found that you get systematic effects depending
    > on the binning size that you use. I believe he has some other comments
    > on the methodology and documenting thereof. I've cc:'d Eric on this
    > message, in hopes that he will explain in greater detail what the issue
    > is.
    >
    > -Rob
    >
    > On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 02:51:02PM -0300, Chris Lidman wrote:
    > > Hi Gabriele,
    > > I've read through the first part of your evolution paper and
    > > I've made some minor corrections to the LaTex source. I've
    > > also made some comments, see the attached files called Notes.txt, on
    > > how the text could be made clearer.
    > >
    > > I'll go through the rest of the paper this week.
    > >
    > > Cheers, Chris.
    > >
    > > PS Have you had any news from Gaston?
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 17 2004 - 00:53:35 PST