From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Wed Apr 16 2003 - 09:22:11 PDT
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 08:55:36AM -0700, Don Groom wrote:
> While it is easy to construct examples (with pathological R(t)) in which
> the redshift cannot be construed as an expansion velocity, we still behave
> schizophrenically and talk about "the expanding Universe." Eric can object
> when he reads this, but he argues that this is OK when combining proper
> motion with cosmological expansion.
You lost me on an antecedant somewhere. Which "this" is OK? My
bastardized version? Or something else?
-Rob
-- --Prof. Robert Knop Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Apr 16 2003 - 09:22:38 PDT