From: clidman (clidman@eso.org)
Date: Fri Apr 04 2003 - 05:56:16 PST
Dear Colleagues,
Since it is unnecessary to take final references for Satie, I will set the priorities to
SN2001gn - An additional 135 minutes
SN2002ff - 530 minutes
SN2002fe - 530 minutes
SN2001gq - 225 minutes
SN2001go - 90 minutes
I think we have enough IR data for SN2001gn (aka Boccherini) and SN2001hb (aka Satie)
to get a rough idea where these SNe lie on the Hubble diagram. Is there a plan to analyse this
data? I am giving a talk in Garching in May and it would be great to have a preliminary result
for these two SNe.
Cheers, Chris.
clidman wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
> I would like to set priorities for the upcoming ISAAC observations to
> take references of SNe we have already observed. The current status with ISAAC
> observations is as follows.
>
> SN z Initial Integration Reference Integration
> =============================================================
> SN2001gn 1.1 550 minutes 522 minutes
> SN2001hb 1.05 200 minutes -
> SN2001go 0.552 50 minutes -
> SN2001gq 0.671 192 minutes -
> SN2002fe 1.086 420 minutes -
> SN2002ff 1.1 530 minutes -
> =============================================================
>
> SN2001gn is almost done. I'd like to spend another 2 hours to match the
> depth of the reference with the initial integration as the reference was
> taken in slightly poorer conditions.
>
> SN2001hb was observed with Gemini. How long was spent on this?
>
> SN2002fe and 2002ff - Are the optical lightcurves of 2002fe and 2002ff
> good enough that we should continue with the ISAAC reference images
>
> Given that we have 35 hours (including overheads), I would suggest the
> following priorities.
>
> SN2001gn - An additional 120 minutes
> SN2002fe - 530 minutes
> SN2002ff - 530 minutes
> SN2001hb - 350 minutes
>
> Cheers, Chris.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Apr 04 2003 - 04:57:49 PST