Re: Satie signal on the ref

From: Isobel Hook (imh@astro.ox.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Apr 04 2003 - 01:50:51 PST

  • Next message: clidman: "ISAAC followup"

    > I don't know what statistical S/N we acheived for Satie in the NIR
    > (assuming no host), but unless it was better than 16, the 3-sigma
    > systematic error under the no-host assumption would be less that the
    > statistical uncertainty.

    For the Gemini observations alone it was around S/N=10-12 I think. I
    remember that we didn't quite reach the target S/N of 14. Perhaps Rachel
    can comment since she did the most recent data reduction on that.

    But we do have both Gemini and VLT data so it's possible that the combined
    data would have S/N>16.

    Isobel.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Apr 04 2003 - 01:51:31 PST