stdin: Updated summary chart -- with some likely HST choices...

As you will see on the attached summary chart, our current best bets for
HST include:
071, 060, 065 -- likely options
007, 081, 012 -- still in the game
061 -- still being observed, if possible

More info (like "light curve" info -- ie., going up or going down --
final HST guide star info, -- ACS GRISM orient info., etc.)
particularly on these candidates would be helpful before the final HST
decisions have to be made 20 hours from now.

Name	position angle	complete	scheduled	galaxy z or [SN z]	SN?	Notes	Galaxy	Field #	Priori	Mag.	Ap .sig	%INC
SuF02-001/ -027		K	--	0.57	matches z			1, 5	5	23.18	42.11	86
SuF02-055		K	--	0.66	matches z			2	5	23.41	40.61	660
SuF02-071		K	--	0.928 OII	matches z	Very nice SN spect	None	1, 5	5	23.92	32.54	582
SuF02-056		G						4	5	24.06	19.06	95
SuF02-002		V	--	0.82	consistent			1	5	24.14	17.39	54
SuF02-021		K		0.69 Sa?				2	4	24.28	20.26	50
SuF02-025		V	--	0.606	matches z			5	5	24.31	18.33	89
SuF02-037		K	-	0.926 OII	matches z	Not strong/obvious SN		2	4	24.39	18.20	27
SuF02-060	elliptic	V G	--	1.063 HK	matches z	Ok SN spectrum	elliptical?	1	4	24.46	16.98	25
SuF02-061		K		1.08???		(only narrow line seen)		3	4	24.55	16.36	105
SuF02-005		V	--	0.86	not clear			2	4	24.57	10.76	16
SuF02-073 *		G (?alex)	--		flat?			5	4	24.58	16.13	20
SuF02-019		K z ~ 0.7	--	0.505	consistent			1	4	24.59	15.13	35
SuF02-017	PA	K V	- (more?)	[1.0]	SN z	Very nice SN spectrum	none	5	5	24.61	12.15	1782
SuF02-000	+80	Kz~1, 1.5	--	0.92	consistent			1	5	24.68	9.65	22
SuF02-028	-58ellip	V	--	0.347	not clear			1, 5	5	24.71	14.03	35
SuF02-077		K	bright host	0.59 Sa?				2	4	24.72	13.35	10
SuF02-004		NO HST	AGN core?			light in ref?		1	3	24.75	12.19	32
SuF02-065	-45	V	--	1.18 OII	matches z	Ok SN, not wonderful	Sb??	1	5	24.80	12.55	34
SuF02-054			bright host					1	4	24.81	11.39	16
SuF02-026[***]		K V	--	1.46 AGN?	not clear			1, 2, 4	5	24.83	11.26	28
SuF02-082		K z ~ 0.6		0.623	matches	nice match for 15%		1	5	25.03	12.67	15
SuF02-083	0 (+45)	V	--	1.272	not seen	fits gal well w/ no SN	starburst?	1	5	25.10	6.08	19
SuF02-007 / -074	PA	V	(more?) VK	[1.18, 0.89]	SN z	Maybe good SN spect; matches -065 at same z	None	1, 4	5	25.1/24.7	5.86	25880
SuF02-081 **		NO HST	VVV	1.48 OII	consistnt?	Surprisingly plausible?!		4	4	25.14	7.92	69
J01		G	--		flat&blu?			2		25.14		107
SuF02-012[***]	elliptic	K V	--(done?)	[1.3]	SN z	both Keck & VLT spect match SN at z=1.3 ok	NB!: elliptical!	1, 2, 4	4	25.17	5.85	118
SuF02-057 **		NO HST	(V)					4	5	25.24	7.21	306
SuF02-051	PA	V	not enough K? but flat					2	5	25.27	8.29	10952
SuF02-059	90/PA	K	not enough					4	5	25.39	5.77	83
SuF02-034	+7							1	4	25.76	4.81	16
SuF02-076 *	PA							5	5	25.83	5.06	398
SuF02-086	PA							1	5	26.19	5.02	181

Photo-z is listed in "completed" column as, for example, "z ~ 0.7" If we have a real spectroscopic redshift estimate it is listed in the “galaxy z or [SN z]” column. In the “complete” and “scheduled” columns G=Gemini; V=VLT; K=Keck.

[Info we thought we had from photo-z codes indicating, for 034, z ~1.5,1.8 and elliptical and burst?? from Hyper z code went away, because they had the wrong host galaxy.

maybe add SuF02-004, but this is probably a late supernova with light on ref, and brighter than reported on the tiles printout AND NO HST guide star.

*= could be observed in the same ACS image (same FOCAS/Gemini slit?) with the other candidate marked with a *

**= could be observed in the same ACS image (same FOCAS/Gemini slit?) with the other candidate marked with a **

[***]= could be observed in the same ACS image (same FOCAS/Gemini slit?) with the other candidate marked with a [***]

1 has 15 candidates (10 are fainter than 24.6) with priorities 4 and 5

2 6 (3)

3 0 (0)

4 7 (6)

5 7 (3)

_____ = still to do

_____ = likely for HST

_____ = still in the running for HST

_____ = not as likely for HST

_--__ = do not get spectroscopy: either this has already been observed, or there is no HST guide star, or the photo-z is low.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 12 2002 - 08:35:50 PST