From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Fri May 31 2002 - 10:31:31 PDT
> If we can do it, our *highest* priority is still S02-075 (which is being
> followed by HST).
I missed that somewhere along the line, and I have gone back through all
my old E-mail. The only one I had a record of us following with HST
from may is T02-015. Did you send out the update that said we were
following S02-075? If so, I didn't get it.
Are there any others besides T02-015 and S02-075?
Of the CFHT supernovae, C02-028/Prolix is my favorite. (I called it
C02-029 before, and was wrong--- note!! C02-028 is the one I like.)
For imaging, let's see what WIYN gets tonight. If WIYN gets nothing,
then we may need to use some FORS time in the next couple of nights for
lightcurve points for our moderate-z CTIO supernovae.
I believe we have some GMOS time next week as well-- Isobel, is this
right?
-Rob
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 17 2002 - 16:12:44 PDT