From: Mamoru Doi (doi@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp)
Date: Sat May 11 2002 - 17:54:18 PDT
Alex,
After we measured %inc, I changed the ranks between S02-080 and S02-078.
Sorry, I didn't add the following explanations.
The first column is our new ranks, and the third columnis our old ranks.
Two columns for %inc are for different aperture sizes (seeing, and 2xseeing).
Now we think S02-078 is anicer than S02-080 as you pointed out.
-Mamoru
>Are you sure? You listed S02-080 as a B candidate earlier (see below)
>and S02-078 as a C candidate. Is S02-078 starting to look better?
>The percentage increase for S02-078 is a lot nicer.
>
>Alex
>
>On Sun, 12 May 2002, Mamoru Doi wrote:
>
>> Sorry,
>>
>> I ment S02-057 and S02-078.
>> >In addition to Rob's list, I think S02-057 and S02-080
>> >may be good candidates.
>>
>> -Mamoru
>> B S02-057 B 24.47 119.8 81.5 possible host seen in Apr
>> B S02-078 C 25.34 85.0 60.3 possible host seen in Apr
>> C S02-080 B 25.38 10.2 5.3 0.5pixel off-center, AGN?
>
Mamoru Doi
Institute of Astronomy
School of Science
Univ. of Tokyo
voice +81-422-34-5084
fax. +81-422-34-5041
doi@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:54:15 PDT