Re: Correction to the time available at cfht

From: Susana Deustua (sedeustua@lbl.gov)
Date: Mon May 06 2002 - 17:35:41 PDT

  • Next message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Re: Correction to the time available at cfht"

    CTIO weather -- seeing is 1.06 arcsec, clear. Thus we should go DEEP, provided
    this holds until the 14h fields come up.

    Susana

    "Robert A. Knop Jr." wrote:

    > > The main reason these additional SNe in fresh fields would be useful is if we
    > > don't have enough "good" CFHT SN candidates at z ~ 0.85 to send to HST.
    > > Otherwise, these would not be followed like the CFHT ones will be in the
    > > rolling search.
    >
    > How many z~0.85 candidates are we going to send to HST? I had thought
    > there was only one in the 14h+5 field, and two over in the SDF field.
    >
    > Please send me a complete list of what we are following and plan to
    > follow at HST this Spring; I don't think I've seen that since the
    > proposal, and I've forgotten the proposal.
    >
    > -Rob 

    --
Susana E. Deustua
Staff Scientist, Physics Division
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Berkeley, CA 94720

    voice: 510-486-7432
fax:   510-486-6738
email: sedeustua@lbl.gov

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 06 2002 - 17:31:01 PDT