Re: Satie

From: clidman (clidman@eso.org)
Date: Sun Apr 21 2002 - 11:03:24 PDT

  • Next message: Ariel Goobar: "Re: Satie"

    Dear Ariel,
        I will ask the VLT to target S02-032 tonight. Conditions
    on Paranal have deteriorated over the last 24 hours. There is
    a strong wind from the North which, if it continues, will prevent
    them from observing S02-032.

    Cheers, Chris.

    Ariel Goobar wrote:

    > Hi,
    > I tend to agree with both Chris and Isobel about the high risk
    > of trying to do both targets at NIRI under the current conditions. It
    > seems to me that it would be sensible to go for the brighter z=1.08
    > target, S02-032, with ISAAC tonight and tomorrow.
    >
    > The 2 x z=0.5 guys for which we also got ISAAC time should be left
    > for the May run, where we should be able to make better optical
    > lightcurves.
    >
    > Ariel
    >
    > On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, clidman wrote:
    >
    > > Hi Isobel,
    > > The ISAAC schedule has been fluid these past two weeks because of technical problems
    > > with the instrument. The 21st an 22nd are service nights. The 23rd to 25th are reserved
    > > for VLTI commissioning and the 26th is a technical night which might be switched to service.
    > > The 27th to 30th are full service nights and the 1st to 3rd are service for the 1st half of the night.
    > >
    > > Cheers, Chris.
    > >
    > >
    > > Isobel Hook wrote:
    > >
    > > > Hi all,
    > > >
    > > > OK well it sounds as though it may not be worth going for a host for
    > > > Satie this NIRI run. If it turns out we dont get to use all our NIRI time
    > > > this run then doing Satie in June is still a possibility (There is no NIRI
    > > > time available in May).
    > > >
    > > > I quite agree with Chris that these observations can take a long time and
    > > > we dont have much of a window. We are hoping to use essentially the whole
    > > > of the upcoming NIRI run (4 nights) so if everything goes perfectly we'll
    > > > get two targets. However banking on a NIRI run going perfectly is probably
    > > > not all that sensible at this stage so maybe we should start one SN with
    > > > ISAAC now.
    > > >
    > > > However I am confused about when ISAAC is availble.
    > > > Chris wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > Because of this problem, ISAAC has been rescheduled to service until
    > > > >the 18th.
    > > > >The 19th is scheduled as technical and may become service. So there is a
    > > > >small window
    > > > >of opportunity to do one candidate now. Service observing restarts on the
    > > > >23rd.
    > > >
    > > > So What is happening now (19-22nd)? Is that time available? Also is
    > > > "service" time the same as queue, i.e. available to us or not? (Is Tony's
    > > > plan on the web correct now? It shows VLTI commissioning 23,24,25).
    > > >
    > > > The disadvantage of using ISAAC now is that this would mean we have less
    > > > ISAAC time next month, when we dont have NIRI time either. Obviously this
    > > > needs to be decided pretty soon. How is this going to be finialised?
    > > >
    > > > Isobel.
    > >
    >
    > --
    > ___________________________________________________________________
    > Ariel Goobar (ariel@physto.se)
    > FYSIKUM, Stockholm University
    > Stockholm Center for Physics, Astronomy & Biotechnology
    > tel: +46 8 55378659



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 21 2002 - 12:08:00 PDT