From: Michael Wood-Vasey (wmwood-vasey@lbl.gov)
Date: Mon Apr 15 2002 - 07:42:14 PDT
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 01:56:07AM -0500, Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:
> Just a note-- please put the "S02" or "C02" on the beginning of the
> candidate numbers; otherwise they are ambiguous. The S02 or C02 are
> part of the name. I thought that everything below was an S02 number,
> except for your note which makes it clear some may be CFHT, at which
> point it because *unclear* what anything is.
Yes. I am disturbed by the trend not to.
> CFHT supernovae should be loaded in as C02, Subaru supernovae as S02.
Next year I propose Su02, as I bet many people are thinking (even
though Rob sent us all an email explaining all this) that the 'S'
stands for Spring, which it does not.
> Have any CFHT supernovae been loaded in? If not, somebody needs to get
> those coordinates and load them into the database.
C02-000
C02-001
C02-002
C02-003
C02-004
C02-005
have all been loaded in by the CFHT group.
- Michael
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 15 2002 - 07:46:28 PDT