\relax 
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Left: from Sullivan et al.; Right: Ariel's analysis of Riess et al.[to be rotated]}}{8}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces  bias in Riess procedure. WARNING: the bias changes subtantially when I change the seed for the random numbers I use to simulate the E(B-V) original distribution. However, the bias tends to be in this direction: more negative $w_0$, more positive $w_a$. This plot was the very first I produced and it happens to match rather precisely the result in Riess et al.! The true underlying cosmological model is a cosmological constant, marked by a cross in the figure. Note that the contour is 1-sigma projected (39\% CL inside). I'm having technical problems getting wider contours (the theory calculations do not converge for crazy values of $w_a$).}}{8}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces  w vs $w\prime $}}{9}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces  Two versions attached -- one shows just the cumulative histogram, the other illustrates the contributions from each sample (but only includes the RCS clusters for which I had $L_B$ values). The RDCS and IRAC overdensities are directly from the numbers each group sent; the RCS values are scaled by comparing his $L_B$ values (converted to have the same area and evolved $M_B$*) to a typical IRAC cluster. Fairly rough, but this should be sufficient for the proposal.}}{9}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces  plot of the estimated overdensities in E+S0 galaxies for the ACS GTO clusters in our sample. The derived overdensities are: Cluster E+S0 overdensity Name zobs (relative to GOODS) ------------------------------------ RXJ0910+54 1.10 5.35 RXJ1252-29 1.24 3.72 RXJ0848+44 1.27 2.87 (x-ray selected) CLJ0848+44B 1.27 2.12 (IR selected companion) The cluster E+S0 classifications are based on visual classification from ACS data. Cluster data restricted to central 250 kpc (radius). The GOODS E+S0 surface density is estimated by multiplying the full surface density by 0.25 - i.e., assumed that 75are spirals or Irregulars.}}{10}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces a couple of images of 1252-29; perhaps worth sending in a color image because there is the reasonable chance that the proposal will be viewed in color on a laptop by the panel members, as opposed to a greyscale printout. The first one is an HST ACS image of the central region, and the second is a ground-based image covering a larger area along with X-ray contours. }}{10}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Simulated search, SN mags vs. time.}}{11}}