[Fwd: Berkeley Lab news release: Homing on Dark Energy]

From: Tony Spadafora (ALSpadafora@lbl.gov)
Date: Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:41:39 PDT

  • Next message: Tony Spadafora: "VU Press release: Dr Knop, mad scientist"

    SCP colleagues:

    Rob's HST paper is on today's astroph posting (astro-ph/0309368) (at
    last!) and this LBNL press release was sent out this morning and posted
    on the web. A Vanderbilt release will be issued very soon, and a
    Stockholm one is in the works.

    -Tony

    -------- Original Message --------
    Subject: Berkeley Lab news release: Homing on Dark Energy
    Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 09:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
    Resent-From: lbl-news@lbl.gov
    Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 09:12:30 -0700
    From: Paul Preuss <paul_preuss@lbl.gov>
    Organization: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
    To: LBL-news@lbl.gov

    HOMING IN ON DARK ENERGY WITH SUPERNOVA STUDIES IN SPACE

    (An illustrated version of this release is on the web at
    http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/Phys-HST-supernovae.html)

    Contact: Paul Preuss, (510) 486-6249, paul_preuss@lbl.gov

    BERKELEY, CA -- A unique set of 11 distant Type Ia
    supernovae studied with the Hubble Space Telescope sheds new
    light on dark energy, according to the latest findings of
    the Supernova Cosmology Project, recently posted at
    http://www.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0309368,
    and soon to appear in the Astrophysical Journal.

    Light curves and spectra from the 11 distant supernovae
    constitute "a strikingly beautiful data set, the largest
    such set collected solely from space," says Saul Perlmutter,
    an astrophysicist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
    and leader of the Supernova Cosmology Project (SCP). The SCP
    is an international collaboration of researchers from the
    United States, Sweden, France, the United Kingdom, Chile,
    Japan, and Spain.

    Type Ia supernovae are among astronomy's best "standard
    candles," so similar that their brightness provides a
    dependable gauge of their distance, and so bright they are
    visible billions of light years away.

    The new study reinforces the remarkable discovery, announced
    by the Supernova Cosmology Project early in 1998, that the
    expansion of the universe is accelerating due to a
    mysterious energy that pervades all space. That finding was
    based on data from over three dozen Type Ia supernovae, all
    but one of them observed from the ground. A competing group,
    the High-Z Supernova Search Team, independently announced
    strikingly consistent results, based on an additional 14
    supernovae, also predominantly observed from the ground.

    Because the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) is unaffected by
    the atmosphere, its images of supernovae are much sharper
    and stronger and provide much better measurements of
    brightness than are possible from the ground. Robert A.
    Knop, assistant professor of physics and astronomy at
    Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tenn., led the Supernova
    Cosmology Project's data analysis of the 11 supernovae
    studied with the HST and coauthored the Astrophysical
    Journal report with the 47 other members of the SCP.

    "The HST data also provide a strong test of host-galaxy
    extinction," Knop says, referring to concerns that
    measurements of the true brightness of supernovae could be
    thrown off by dust in distant galaxies, which might absorb
    and scatter their light. But dust would also make a
    supernova's light redder, much as our sun looks redder at
    sunset because of dust in the atmosphere. Because the data
    from space show no anomalous reddening with distance, Knop
    says, the supernovae "pass the test with flying colors."

    "Limiting such uncertainties is crucial for using supernovae
    -- or any other astronomical observations -- to explore the
    nature of the universe," says Ariel Goobar, a member of SCP
    and a professor of particle astrophysics at Stockholm
    University in Sweden. The extinction test, says Goobar,
    "eliminates any concern that ordinary host-galaxy dust could
    be a source of bias for these cosmological results at
    high-redshifts." (See "What is Host-Galaxy Extinction?"
    under additional information, below.)

    The term for the mysterious "repulsive gravity" that drives
    the universe to expand ever faster is dark energy. The new
    data are able to provide much tighter estimates of the
    relative density of matter and dark energy in the universe:
    under straightforward assumptions, 25 percent of the
    composition of the universe is matter of all types and 75
    percent is dark energy. Moreover, the new data provides a
    more precise measure of the "springiness" of the dark
    energy, the pressure that it applies to the universe's
    expansion per unit of density.

    Among the numerous attempts to explain the nature of dark
    energy, some are allowed by these new measurements --
    including the cosmological constant originally proposed by
    Albert Einstein -- but others are ruled out, including some
    of the simplest models of the theories known as
    quintessence. (See "What is Dark Energy?" under additional
    information, below.)

    High-redshift supernovae are the best single tool for
    measuring the properties of dark energy -- and eventually
    determining what dark energy is. As supernova studies with
    the HST demonstrate, the best place to study high-redshift
    supernovae is with a telescope in space, unaffected by the
    atmosphere.

    Nevertheless, "to make the best use of a telescope in space,
    it's essential to make the best use of the finest telescopes
    on the ground," says SCP member Chris Lidman of the European
    Southern Observatory.

    For the supernovae in the present study, the SCP team
    invented a strategy whereby the Hubble Space Telescope could
    quickly respond to discoveries made from the ground, despite
    the need to schedule HST time long in advance. Working
    together, the SCP and the Space Telescope Science Institute
    implemented the strategy to superb effect.

    The current study, based on HST observations of 11
    supernovae, points the way to the next generation of
    supernova research: in the future, the
    SuperNova/Acceleration Probe, or SNAP satellite, will
    discover thousands of Type Ia supernovae and measure their
    spectra and their light curves from the earliest moments,
    through maximum brightness, until their light has died away.

    SCP's Perlmutter is now leading an international group of
    collaborators based at Berkeley Lab who are developing SNAP
    with the support of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office
    of Science. It may be that the best candidate for a correct
    theory of dark energy will be identified soon after SNAP
    begins operating. A world of new physics will open as a
    result.

    "New constraints on omega-m, omega-lambda, and w from an
    independent set of eleven high-redshift supernovae observed
    with the HST," by Robert A. Knop and 47 others (the
    Supernova Cosmology Project), will appear in the
    Astrophysical Journal and is currently available online at
    http://www.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0309368.

    For more about the Supernova Cosmology Project visit
    http://supernova.lbl.gov/. For more about the Hubble Space
    Telescope and the Space Telescope Science Institute visit
    http://www.stsci.edu/resources/. For more about the SNAP
    satellite visit http://snap.lbl.gov/.

    The Berkeley Lab is a U.S. Department of Energy national
    laboratory located in Berkeley, California. It conducts
    unclassified scientific research and is managed by the
    University of California.

    Additional information:

    "What is Host-Galaxy Extinction?"

    Type Ia supernovae are among the best standard candles known
    to astronomy -- objects whose distance can be determined
    because their intrinsic brightness is known or can be
    computed, just as the distance to a 100-watt bulb can be
    calculated by comparing its apparent brightness with its
    actual brightness.

    Determining the expansion rate of the universe by comparing
    the brightness and redshift of far-off Type Ia supernovae
    therefore critically depends on accurate measurements of
    both.

    One worrisome possible source of error in measuring distant
    supernovae has been host-galaxy extinction, the filtering
    effect of dust peculiar to the galaxy in which the supernova
    occurs. Dust occurs in our own galaxy too, but has been so
    extensively studied that it is of less concern in supernova
    distance measurements.

    The concern is that distant supernovae appear dimmer not
    because of the accelerating effects of dark energy but, more
    prosaically, because of dust. There is a straightforward way
    to distinguish these effects, however, since dust normally
    reddens the light passing through it. Shorter, bluer
    wavelengths are absorbed and scattered more readily than
    longer, redder wavelengths.

    "When you want to measure a supernova's brightness you can
    measure the light that was blue when it left, or the light
    that was red," says Greg Aldering, a member of the Supernova
    Cosmology Project and leader of the Nearby Supernova Factory
    program, which concentrates on studying the intrinsic
    properties of Type Ia supernovae. "Both measurements are
    valid, but what you want is to make sure you get the same
    answer on both sides of the spectrum. If the blue is
    fainter, you've got a dust problem."

    The extraordinarily high quality of photometric data from
    the 11 distant supernovae studied by the Hubble Space
    Telescope in this study allowed their intrinsic brightness
    to be determined and compared in both bands.

    The study determined that no anomalous effects of
    host-galaxy extinction occur at great distance; distant
    supernovae are comparable to nearby supernovae in this
    respect, underlining their utility as standard candles.

    "What is Dark Energy?"

    When SCP researchers initially set out to measure the
    expansion rate of the universe, they expected to find that
    distant supernovae appeared brighter than their redshifts
    would suggest, indicating a slowing rate of expansion.
    Instead they found the opposite: at a given redshift,
    distant supernovae were dimmer than expected. Expansion was
    accelerating.

    Not only did this discovery mean that the universe would
    never come to an end, more fundamentally it implied that a
    large part of the universe is made of something we know
    nothing about -- the mysterious whatever-it-is that goes by
    the name "dark energy."

    Later, new measurements of cosmic microwave background (CMB)
    radiation provided strong evidence that the universe is flat
    (having an overall geometry of space like Euclid's, in which
    parallel lines never meet or diverge) -- and because there
    is not enough matter in the universe, whether visible or
    dark, to produce flatness, the difference can be attributed
    to dark energy, providing a strong confirmation of the
    supernova measurements.

    The first attempt to explain the nature of dark energy was
    by invoking Albert Einstein's notorious "cosmological
    constant," an extra term he introduced early in the the
    equations of the theory of general relativity in the 20th
    century under the mistaken impression, shared by astronomers
    and cosmologists of the time, that the universe was static.
    The cosmological constant, which Einstein signified by the
    Greek letter lambda, made it so.

    Einstein happily abandoned the cosmological constant when,
    in 1929, Edwin Hubble found the universe was not static but
    expanding. However, lambda came back strong -- albeit 70
    years later! -- when supernova studies led to the discovery
    that expansion was accelerating.

    "For the cosmological constant, the vacuum -- space itself
    -- possesses a certain springiness," says Eric Linder, a
    cosmologist at Berkeley Lab and director of the Center for
    Cosmology and Spacetime Physics at Florida Atlantic
    University. "As you stretch it, you don't lose energy, you
    store extra energy in it just like a rubber band."

    Such springiness, whether of matter, energy, or space
    itself, is described mathematically by a term called the
    equation-of-state parameter (w). For lambda, the value of
    this parameter is minus one, corresponding to a component of
    the universe that has "negative pressure" -- unlike matter
    or radiation, which have zero or positive pressure. True to
    its name, the cosmological constant doesn't change over
    time: the energy stored by lambda scales uniformly,
    increasing exactly as the volume of the universe increases.

    The problem is that the most obvious source for lambda's
    stored energy is what quantum theory calls the energy of the
    vacuum ?? so much more powerful (10 to the 120th power!)
    than what's been observed for lambda, Linder says, that if
    this were the dark energy "it would overwhelm the expansion
    of the universe. It would have brought the universe to a
    swift end a miniscule fraction of a second after it was
    created in the big bang."

    Other explanations of dark energy, called "quintessence,"
    originate from theoretical high-energy physics. In addition
    to baryons, photons, neutrinos, and cold dark matter,
    quintessence posits a fifth kind of matter (hence the name),
    a sort of universe-filling fluid that acts like it has
    negative gravitational mass. The new constraints on
    cosmological parameters imposed by the HST supernova data,
    however, strongly discourage at least the simplest models of
    quintessence.

    Quite different "topological defect" models attribute dark
    energy to defects created as the early universe cooled,
    during the phase changes that precipitated different forces
    and particles from a highly symmetrical early state.

    Certain of these theoretical defects, known as domain walls,
    could have partitioned space into distinct cells whose
    boundaries would have repulsive gravity, thus filling the
    role of dark energy. But the new HST supernovae study rules
    out -- with 99 percent certainty -- domain walls as the
    source of dark energy.

    While the case for the cosmological constant looks strong by
    comparison to these alternatives, many other exciting
    possibilities remain. Some even propose a cosmos in which
    our universe, having three dimensions of space, is afloat in
    a higher-dimensional world, with gravity free to interact
    among the dimensions.

    Or there could be a time-varying form of dark energy that
    only temporarily mimics lambda. If it becomes less
    gravitationally repulsive in the future, it could bring
    acceleration to a halt, perhaps even causing expansion to
    reverse and triggering the collapse of the universe.

    The opposite is also possible: superaccelerating dark
    energy. These models have w, the equation-of-state
    parameter, less than minus one -- unlike lambda, stored
    energy would not scale uniformly as the universe expands but
    increase faster than the increase in volume.

    "One of the goals of the SuperNova/Acceleration Probe
    satellite is to determine whether w may be changing with
    time," says Saul Perlmutter, coprincipal investigator of the
    SNAP satellite now under development. "This will help us
    narrow the possibilities for the nature of dark energy.
    That's an exciting prospect for physicists, because
    understanding dark energy will be crucial to finding a
    final, unified picture of physics."

    [END FILE]



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:42:01 PDT