Re: late-time fitting debate

From: G_Goldhaber@lbl.gov
Date: Sun Mar 16 2003 - 14:01:07 PST

Next message: Don Groom: "Re: late-time fitting debate"

Previous message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Re: 97aj"
Maybe in reply to: Greg Aldering: "late-time fitting debate"
Next in thread: Lifan Wang: "Re: late-time fitting debate"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I agree with Rob that we have to terminate this discussion. I second
Greg's suggestion for the one and only refitting. I found that the
floor of 0.007 took care of the Hamuy data.If we prefer we can
attribute this to template uncertainty.

On Monday I will make the comparison of "old and new" for the Hamuy
data.
I will also try to study how the differences compare with the quoted
errors. Gerson

text/x-vcard attachment: Card for <G_Goldhaber@lbl.gov>

Next message: Don Groom: "Re: late-time fitting debate"
Previous message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Re: 97aj"
Maybe in reply to: Greg Aldering: "late-time fitting debate"
Next in thread: Lifan Wang: "Re: late-time fitting debate"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 16 2003 - 14:01:35 PST