Re: confirm S02-032?

From: DAHowell@lbl.gov
Date: Mon Apr 22 2002 - 20:52:59 PDT

  • Next message: Ariel Goobar: "post-doc position in Stockholm"

    I think that we really must get more on this SN if we are going to use
    it. The fact that it is so bright worries me. We will never have
    another shot, so it is now or never. If it has brightened, it may be
    easier to get spectroscopy now anyway.

    -Andy

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Lifan Wang <lifan@panisse.lbl.gov>
    Date: Monday, April 22, 2002 7:08 pm
    Subject: Re: confirm S02-032?

    > > From owner-deepnews@listserv.lbl.gov Mon Apr 22 18:56:56 2002
    > > X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.lbl.gov: majordom set sender
    > to owner-deepnews@listserv.lbl.gov using -f
    > > X-Sender: ihook@vela
    > > To: Greg Aldering <aldering@panisse.lbl.gov>
    > > cc: deepnews@lbl.gov
    > > Subject: Re: confirm S02-032?
    > > MIME-Version: 1.0
    > > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
    > > Sender: owner-deepnews@lbl.gov
    > >
    > >
    > > Hi,
    > >
    > > I would support that if its possible. The Subaru spectrum was
    > quite low
    > > signal to noise - but wouldn't it take more than an hour with
    > VLT to
    > > improve on it?
    >
    > Of the three half hour SUBARU exposures, only one is showing
    > sufficient signal
    > to be useful. One hour exposure with good seeing could be sufficient.
    >
    > >
    > > Isobel.
    > >
    > >
    > > On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Greg Aldering wrote:
    > >
    > > > Hi Chris,
    > > >
    > > > We were wondering whether there is some value in getting a better
    > > > confirmation spectrum of S02-032 with FORS2. Is this possible?
    > > > Does anyone else have an opinion on spending an hour on this?
    > > >
    > > > Cheers,
    > > >
    > > > Greg, Saul, Tony
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 22 2002 - 20:56:59 PDT