Name

position angle

complete

 

scheduled

 

galaxy z

or [SN z]

SN?

Notes

Galaxy

Field #

Priori

Mag.

Ap .sig

%INC

SuF02-001/ -027

 

K

--

0.57

matches z

 

 

1, 5

5

23.18

42.11

86

SuF02-055

 

K

--

0.66

matches z

 

 

2

5

23.41

40.61

660

SuF02-071

 

K

--

0.928 OII

matches z

Very nice SN spect

None

1, 5

5

23.92

32.54

582

SuF02-056

 

G

 

 

 

 

 

4

5

24.06

19.06

95

SuF02-002

 

V

--

0.82

consistent

 

 

1

5

24.14

17.39

54

SuF02-021

 

K

 

0.69 Sa?

 

 

 

2

4

24.28

20.26

50

SuF02-025

 

V

--

0.606

matches z

 

 

5

5

24.31

18.33

89

SuF02-037

 

K

-

0.926 OII

matches z

Not strong/obvious  SN

 

2

4

24.39

18.20

27

SuF02-060

elliptic

V G

--

1.063 HK

matches z

Ok SN spectrum

elliptical?

1

4

24.46

16.98

25

SuF02-061

 

K

 

1.08???

 

(only narrow line seen)

 

3

4

24.55

16.36

105

SuF02-005

 

V 

--

0.86

not clear

 

 

2

4

24.57

10.76

16

SuF02-073 *

 

G  (?alex)

--

 

flat?

 

 

5

4

24.58

16.13

20

SuF02-019

 

K z ~ 0.7

--

0.505

consistent

 

 

1

4

24.59

15.13

35

SuF02-017

PA

K V

- (more?)

[1.0]

SN z

Very nice SN spectrum

none

5

5

24.61

12.15

1782

SuF02-000

+80

Kz~1, 1.5

--

0.92 

consistent

 

 

1

5

24.68

9.65

22

SuF02-028

-58ellip

V

--

0.347

not clear

 

 

1, 5

5

24.71

14.03

35

SuF02-077

 

K

bright host

0.59 Sa?

 

 

 

2

4

24.72

13.35

10

SuF02-004

 

NO HST

AGN core?

 

 

light in ref?

 

1

3

24.75

12.19

32

SuF02-065

-45

V

--

1.18 OII

matches z

Ok SN,  not wonderful

Sb??

1

5

24.80

12.55

34

SuF02-054

 

 

bright host

 

 

 

 

1

4

24.81

11.39

16

SuF02-026[***]

 

K V

--

1.46 AGN?

not clear

 

 

1, 2, 4

5

24.83

11.26

28

SuF02-082

 

K z ~ 0.6

 

0.623

matches

nice match for 15%

 

1

5

25.03

12.67

15

SuF02-083

0 (+45)

V

--

1.272

not seen

fits gal well w/ no SN

starburst?

1

5

25.10

6.08

19

SuF02-007 / -074

PA

V

(more?) VK

[1.18, 0.89]

SN z

Maybe good SN spect;

matches -065 at same z

None

1, 4

5

25.1/24.7

5.86

25880

SuF02-081 **

 

NO HST

VVV

1.48 OII

consistnt?

Surprisingly plausible?!

 

4

4

25.14

7.92

69

J01

 

G

--

 

flat&blu?

 

 

2

 

25.14

 

107

SuF02-012[***]

elliptic

K V

--(done?)

[1.3]

SN z

both Keck & VLT spect match SN at z=1.3 ok

NB!: elliptical!

1, 2, 4

4

25.17

5.85

118

SuF02-057 **

 

NO HST

(V)

 

 

 

 

4

5

25.24

7.21

306

SuF02-051

PA

V

not enough K? but flat

 

 

 

 

2

5

25.27

8.29

10952

SuF02-059

90/PA

K

not enough

 

 

 

 

4

5

25.39

5.77

83

SuF02-034

+7

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

4

25.76

4.81

16

SuF02-076 *

PA

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

5

25.83

5.06

398

SuF02-086

PA

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

5

26.19

5.02

181

 

Photo-z is listed in "completed" column as, for example, "z ~ 0.7"    If we have a real spectroscopic redshift estimate it is listed in the “galaxy z or [SN z]” column.   In the “complete” and “scheduled” columns  G=Gemini;  V=VLT;   K=Keck.

 

[Info we thought we had from photo-z codes indicating, for 034,  z ~1.5,1.8 and elliptical and burst??  from Hyper z code went away, because they had the wrong host galaxy.

maybe add SuF02-004, but this is probably a late supernova with light on ref, and brighter than reported on the tiles printout AND NO HST guide star.

*= could be observed in the same ACS image (same FOCAS/Gemini slit?)  with the other candidate marked with a *

**= could be observed in the same ACS image (same FOCAS/Gemini slit?) with the other candidate marked with a **

[***]= could be observed in the same ACS image (same FOCAS/Gemini slit?) with the other candidate marked with a [***]

 

1 has 15 candidates (10 are fainter than 24.6) with priorities 4 and 5

2         6                    (3)

3         0                    (0)

4         7                    (6)

5         7                    (3)

 

_____  = still to do

_____  = likely for HST

_____  = still in the running for HST

_____  = not as likely for HST

_--__  = do not get spectroscopy:  either this has already been observed, or there is no HST guide star, or the photo-z is low.