sn94361 spectra

Alternate names:

94361.host.keck.960119.asc / 94361.host.keck.960119.fits [fits file made from ascii file - no header info]: Bev Oke Keck spectrum of the host; Isobel's "host3keck.spec". Isobel says z=0.354 based on H&K absorption, OII emission, Balmer series absorption. Rknop might say 0.355 or 0.356. The E-mail from Bev Oke with these spectra has the caution "These files cannot be distributed to anyone and any use of them must be Oked by Judy Cohen and myself." Is this still true?
94361.sn.keck.960119.asc / 94361.sn.keck.960119.fits [fits file made from ascii file - no header info]: Bev Oke Keck spectrum of sn; Isobel's "sn3keck.spec". Isobel says spectrum is no use; Alex says it matches sn82a 9 days after max with z=0.354. Rknop says a better match seems to be z=0.38 at 3 days after max (date of max is 960116), though it is very weak.
94361.host.wht.960115.asc: Observer='CMC' (Mike Irwin?) at WHT, 15Jan94 or 18Jan94 depending on which header keyword you believe (DAT-OBS and DATE respectively). This file is Isobel's "cl1147_48_50_52.spec"; host?? Isobel says z=0.354 based on Mgb, 5286 absorption. Doubtful at best. No convincing H, K, balmer series as was seen in the keck host spectrum.
94361.host2.wht.960115.asc: Same as above; Isobel's "cl1147_62_64_67.spec". What is the difference between this and the previous? Isobel says z=0.354 doesn't look quite right. RKnop concurs.