Gemini GMOS Data files:

Date: 16 April 2002
Exposure time:
Data reduced by: Isobel
Weather note:
z (gal): 0.88
z (SN): 0.88 (if cleaned)
SN: [asc] [fits] [2d fits] [ps]
line cleaned SN: [asc] [fits]
Comparison (Cleaned, 5A binned): SN 1981B, max, z=0.88 [ps]
Output file from Andy's program: [txt]

Keck ESI Data files:

Date: 15 April 2002
Exposure time:
Data reduced by: Isobel
Note: This data not nearly as good as Gemini data.
SN: [asc] [fits] [ps]


Isobel (Keck, preliminary): z~0.85?? Maybe a SN bump around 8000A. Needs redoing. Flux in blue though.

Isobel (Gemini, preliminary): I think this one is at z=0.88. It has weak OII, and its neighbour galaxy has strong OII at a very similar z. Its quite clear in the 2d image: S02_049c_2d.fits - look at x=~1240, y=1149. That's the target. The neighbor galaxy is below it. (Scale =0.145"/pix)

Andy (Gemini, preliminary): After running the spectrum through lineclean in IRAF, the best match in the range z=0.4 to 1.2 is at 0.88. My program picks SN 1981B at maximum as the best-fit SN after subtracting an Sa host galaxy.

If I don't clean the spectrum first, then the feature at 9300 A is much deeper, and dominates any fits, producing results that are all over tha place. I don't believe these though. The cleaned version is much better.

Even after cleaning, the match isn't perfect, but that may be because the spectrum is so noisy. So I agree with Isobel that this is probably a Ia at z=0.88. By eye Si 4000/7500 is obvious -- maybe too obvious. If that really is Si 4000, I have never seen it that broad before. Also, the fit in the 7800 to 8000 region is not great.


This SN sent to HST ACS.

Page maintained by Andy Howell (DAHowell@lbl.gov)