From: Andy Howell (howell@astro.utoronto.ca)
Date: Fri Mar 12 2004 - 13:11:49 PST
Yes I realized that right after I sent the email.
Here it is binned at 20A.
-Andy
On 12 Mar 2004, Chris Lidman wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> Thanks for the data. In order to make them consistent with the other
> plots in the paper, can you rebin the host galaxy subtracted data. I
> do not recall what you had used in the past, but I think it was close
> to 20 Angstroms.
>
> Cheers, Chris.
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 20:18, Andy Howell wrote:
> > Chris,
> > I agree that we should take S01-035 out.
> >
> > Also, I have refit S01-031 at z=0.777 allowing only E and S0 subtraction.
> > I think it is a probable Ia, if there is significant host contamination or
> > reddening (the original observation is very red -- my program has to
> > subtract a lot of host and deredden to make it fit a Ia). So Ia? -> Ia is
> > fine with me. A tar.gz file with postscript and text files of my
> > new fit are attached.
> >
> > -Andy
> >
> > On 11 Mar 2004,
> > Chris Lidman wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Andy,
> > > I am thinking of excluding S01-035 from sample. We observed this
> > > one because it was bright and the seeing at the time was very bad.
> > > If the observations had have been done in service, we would
> > > not have even observed this target this candidate. The candidate
> > > is probably a variable star of some kind.
> > >
> > > Opinions. This is the only I think we should exclude.
> > >
> > > Cheers, Chris.
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 18:17, Chris Lidman wrote:
> > > > Hi Andy,
> > > > In regards to S01-004, I should have said that the spectrum
> > > > was taken 21 days after the reference images which showed nothing -
> > > > no host, no SN. I'll leave the classification of this one as "?"
> > > >
> > > > I've had a closer look at the spectrum of S01-031 and I believe that
> > > > I see the H and K in what we can probably now classify as
> > > > an elliptical host. This would put the host at z=0.777. From
> > > > your fits, a SN at z=0.76 was the best fit and we had classified
> > > > this as a possible Ia. I'm thinking of raising the status of this one
> > > > from Ia? to Ia.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers, Chris.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Mar 12 2004 - 13:11:59 PST