From: Serena Nobili (serena@physto.se)
Date: Tue Feb 03 2004 - 02:57:18 PST
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Vitaliy Fadeyev wrote:
>
>According to the Rob's paper, 40-50 days threshold refered to the rest frame,
>and the restframe coverage of sn1999q does not extent beyond 40 days.
>(The snminuit lightcurves have observation time axis.) Because of this,
>I'm not sure if I want to redo the fits.
>
Dear Vitaliy,
I do agree with you, of course I miss-interpreted the time axis in the
snminuit plots to be restframe. I am sorry about that. I would like to
thank you once more for your help with this work. All I need to do now is
to introduce these information in the analysis and find a good way to
present it in the paper. I will be ready with a new draft very soon.
Cheers
Serena
----------------------------------------------------------------------
www.physto.se/~serena
Tel +46 8 55378661
Give free food at:
http://www.porloschicos.com/
http://www.thehungersite.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Feb 03 2004 - 02:57:21 PST