From: Bahram Mobasher (mobasher@stsci.edu)
Date: Mon Jul 12 2004 - 14:42:38 PDT
Rob,
I calculated redshifts using both apertures. The advantage of using the
ACS data only is that we do not get blending, which would compromise the
photometric accuracy and hence, the accuracy of redshifts. the disadvantage
is that we get less strong constraints, as we cannot include the near-IR data.
Fortunately, in this case the overall result is similar to the previous case
(i.e. using ground-based+ACS photometry). Here are the results:
2.935 aperture
1 2 3 4 5 6
knot 1 2.00 1.61 2.39 starburst 2.00
knot 2 2.10 1.69 2.51 starburst 2.10
bridge 1.40 1.08 1.72 Irr 1.40
neighb 2.10 1.69 2.51 starburst 2.10
4.165 aperture
1 2 3 4 5 6
knot 1 1.70 1.35 2.18 starburst 1.72
knot 2 2.10 1.69 2.51 starburst 2.10
bridge 1.44 0.72 2.09 Irr 0.90
neighb 2.10 1.69 2.51 starburst 2.10
1 object
2 phot-z (with prior)
3,4 95% confidence interval
5 spectral typee
6 phot-z (without prior)
Bahram
****************************************************************************
* * *
* Bahram Mobasher * Phone: (410) 338 4974 *
* Space Telescope Science Institute * *
* 3700 San Martin Drive * fax: (410) 338 5090 *
* Baltimore MD 21218 * *
* USA * email: mobasher@stsci.edu *
* * *
****************************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jul 12 2004 - 14:43:24 PDT