From: Rachel A. Gibbons (ragibbons@lbl.gov)
Date: Wed Jun 16 2004 - 09:57:39 PDT
I suppose I shouldn't say it "must" be a line added by Dan Green.
But it certainly could be something he'd do without consulting Lou et al.
If there are follow-up observations showing a lightcurve or spectrum (I
haven't gone back to the Riess paper yet), then Dan Green is wrong.
Anyone checked yet the accuracy of the statement? Also to say SN 2003eq
is in the same field isn't the same as saying it's at the same position.
I'd be surprized if Lou would make such a vague statement.
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Rachel A. Gibbons wrote:
>
> Interesting. That must be a line added by Dan Green.
>
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Ariel Goobar wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> > there is a line at the end of the reported SNe saying that
> > SN2003eq, one of the "gold" events in Riess et al 2004, was
> > re-observed and is posibly not a supernova!
> > Ariel
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Tony Spadafora wrote:
> >
> > > HST search,
> > >
> > > In lieu of a circular, the May search results have now appeared on the
> > > CBAT Possible-Supernovae Page:
> > >
> > > http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/CBAT_PSN.html
> > >
> > > in case you haven't heard, the other group is now calling itself "PANS"
> > >
> > > ..." L. Strolger (STScI) and R. Gibbons (LBL) report, on behalf of the
> > > `Probing Acceleration Now with Supernova' (PANS) Team and the
> > > Supernova Cosmology
> > > Project, respectively ...
> > >
> > > -Tony
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
-- ------------------------------ Dr. R. A. Gibbons Lawrence Berkeley National Lab 1 Cyclotron Rd MS 50R5032 Berkeley, CA 94720-8160 USA Tel 510.486.7416 ------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 16 2004 - 09:58:19 PDT