From: Saul Perlmutter (saul@lbl.gov)
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 09:31:22 PDT
We probably should mention that we have a few more likely-junk
candidates that we are revisiting, given the low number of good
very-high-redshift candidates (and that we'll let them know if we see
any hope for them).
Maybe, we should not discuss the gravitational lensing issues for -033
at this point, unless they bring it up, since this will be one of the
science judgement calls that we may have to make on following this one,
if they don't.
We should probably save all of our own discussion of what we want to do
in terms of followup of any of this run's candidates for later after
this meeting.
Anything else to think about for this phone meeting? Otherwise, it
seems like a fairly straightforward meeting -- unless we discover that
something is wrong when we compare numbers with them.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 24 2004 - 09:32:01 PDT