Re: We're probably ready for the "fast-and-dirty" request for photo-z's (and maybe a careful photo-z for 011)...

From: Tony Spadafora (ALSpadafora@lbl.gov)
Date: Sun May 23 2004 - 13:11:29 PDT

  • Next message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Incmoing soon from Rachel and Rob"

    Mobasher cannot post to hstsearch (Adam and Bill J can, but we would
    need Marty to enable Mobasher. ) Have him cc to a few people and
    whoever sees it first should do a redirect or forward. (anything he
    sends to hstearch will bounce, but I will see it and can redirect it.)

    -Tony

    On May 23, 2004, at 12:58 PM, Saul Perlmutter wrote:

    > Hi HST-searchers (and especially those over at Nashville),
    >
    > We're probably ready for at least the "fast-and-dirty" request for
    > a list of photo-z's (and maybe a careful photo-z for 011). We would
    > probably like to know the photo-z's for the current Priority 3's, for
    > example. It looks like Marek has found the improved coordinates for
    > all of these except -025. (Is that right Marek, and do you have them
    > in a single list form that we could send in?)
    >
    > Last run, Bahram Mobasher asked that I be the one person that
    > would be sending him requests, so I should probably send in whatever
    > list we want him to look at -- but I will specify to him that it would
    > really help if "hstsearch@lbl.glov" is CC'd on every communication he
    > (or we) send.
    > Are there any other candidates we want to add to (or take away from
    > ) the Priority 4 and 3 lists? I think Bahram doesn't mind if we ask
    > for extra ones to be done in the "fast-and-dirty" mode, since these
    > don't take him much time. (Maybe some of the Priority 1 list, just so
    > we know what we think the odds are that these are in fact low-z
    > supernovae even though we are not going to follow up?)
    >
    > Also, is there any candidate besides -001 for which we might
    > already want a more detailed work-up? (I'm betting not.)
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun May 23 2004 - 13:12:17 PDT