From: Tony Spadafora (ALSpadafora@lbl.gov)
Date: Wed Apr 28 2004 - 16:27:36 PDT
Saul's and my recollection of the discussion with Adam on the morning
of the TOO were basically as in Vitalily's note below. We weren't
taking about sharing any data, but general feedback on the followup. I
don't recall any specifics, but something like postage stamp jpegs
would be consistent with the general idea.
Saul should be in the loop regarding what info get shared with Adam.
Rachel is drafting a response - can you please work out with him what
we're kinds of info we're sharing (at least at a general level).
-Tony
On Apr 28, 2004, at 3:59 PM, Rachel A. Gibbons wrote:
>
> Hi hstsearch,
>
> But his were data that were already published, so it's not quite
> the
> same kind of information sharing.
>
> It's also a bit strange he would seem surprized by the rapid
> fading in
> z-band. Our new observations match what both Ariel and I predicted
> for a
> Ia at this redshift.
>
> In any case, it sounds to me as though no one promised to give
> Adam as
> many details as he is now asking for. I will forward to hstsearch
> Adam's
> latest response.
>
> Rachel
>
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 VAFadeyev@lbl.gov wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> From my memory, at some point during the discussions
>> that night/morning Adam showed a presentation slide
>> with a bunch of patches with his redshift 1.5 SN.
>> He was saying that the object was fading extremely
>> fast in Z band, which is why they switched to NICMOS
>> in the middle of the followup. This fast fading
>> seemed to perturb him, they did not quite expect
>> that. Later on Adam asked to supply him with our
>> followup expirience relatively fast. His motivation
>> was that there are "not that many" objects at this
>> redshift. This meant to be informal and very
>> preliminary. In fact, I took it to be postage stamp
>> images sharing again.
>>
>> vitaliy
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Robert A. Knop Jr." <robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu>
>> Date: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 1:33 pm
>> Subject: Message from Adam
>>
>>> I got this from Adam.
>>>
>>> What actually was the nature of the agreement that was made re:
>>> tellingAdam about our Followup and sending him stuff?
>>>
>>> -Rob
>>>
>>> ----- Forwarded message from adam riess <ariess@stsci.edu> -----
>>>
>>> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:46:36 -0400 (EDT)
>>> From: adam riess <ariess@stsci.edu>
>>> Subject: Re: April IAUC as sent to Dan Green.
>>> To: ragibbons@lbl.gov
>>> Cc: robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
>>>
>>> Rachel, Rob
>>>
>>> I had asked you guys to share with us how your follow-up
>>> looked of your HST object to add to our database of experience
>>> on effective follow-up and you guys
>>> had agreed. So, how does the grism and images look?
>>> Can we see some jpeg postage stamps? How is
>>> the S/N? Before or after max? Can you tell if it is a Ia?
>>> And how is the NICMOS data?
>>>
>>> -Adam
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- End forwarded message -----
>>>
>>> --
>>> --Prof. Robert Knop
>>> Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
>>> robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> ------------------------------
> Dr. R. A. Gibbons
> Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
> 1 Cyclotron Rd MS 50R5032
> Berkeley, CA 94720-8160
> USA
> Tel 510.486.7416
> ------------------------------
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Apr 28 2004 - 16:27:30 PDT