We should *first* go through good candidates WITH hosts (much higher priority).

From: Saul Perlmutter (saul@lbl.gov)
Date: Sun Apr 04 2004 - 14:54:47 PDT

  • Next message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Re: ACS noise(/depth?) variations - addendum"

    The plan was that we should *first* go through good candidates WITH
    hosts and study them in depth (much higher priority), because these
    would be the ones that we "trigger" on -- and then we add host-less SNe
    that can fit in the same ACS field so that we get their z-band
    lightcurve for free. (If we're really lucky there will be a good
    host-less candidate that will fit on the same NICMOS field, but that
    would be very rare.)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 04 2004 - 14:54:44 PDT