From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Sun Apr 04 2004 - 00:27:54 PST
Unfortunately, it's pervasive. The mistake went into the following
images, and as such the subtractions that use them will have way off
coordinates.
acs02-03_2/jan032003acs3105sum.fts
acs02-03_2/jan032003acs3205sum.fts
acs02-03_2/jan032003acs3403sum.fts
acs02-03_2/jan042003acs4005sum.fts
Note that if I redo these, any candidates re-found will be saved with
*new* names even though they're the same coordinate, because the
software won't recognize them with the way-wrong RA and Dec. (The way
around this is for somebody to update the RA and Dec in the database
using SNTrak for all bad coordinates.) This will be inconvenient; do we
want to mess with it? If so, I can redo subtractions after I've fixed
the coordinate problem, at which point coordinates that come out of
subtractions should all be pretty good.
-Rob
-- --Prof. Robert Knop Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 04 2004 - 00:28:13 PST