Re: Two versions of the plot to look at

From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Sat Jul 12 2003 - 14:30:51 PDT

  • Next message: Greg Aldering: "Re: Two versions of the plot to look at"

    On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 02:00:49PM -0700, Saul Perlmutter wrote:
    > ...If we like the more busy version, we may want to consider also
    > putting the open circle (unaveraged) points on the bottom panel.

    That can't be right-- there are fewer unaveraged points than averaged
    points.

    Or is it that all the others are bins with only one supernova, so that
    they got overwritten by an "averaged" point? I'd say that that makes
    the whole thing confusing. With a larger bin size, it might make sense,
    but as is the first question everybody is going to have is "why are
    there fewer raw points than averaged points?", this requiring the
    explanation. I'm not sure that it adds anything.

    For the new figure, let's just do it binned. We already have the
    unbinned data in the existing figure.

    -Rob 

    -- 
--Prof. Robert Knop
  Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
  robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 12 2003 - 14:30:54 PDT