From: Greg Aldering (aldering@panisse.lbl.gov)
Date: Wed Jul 09 2003 - 18:39:09 PDT
In the abstract it says "... show *no trend* of anomalous negative
E(B-V) at higher redshifts."
Also, from your reply to the referee you say
"This correlation bewteen [sic] \ebv\ and $z$---" was added to
the paper.
Both are examples of the problem I am concerned about.
>On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:41:45AM -0700, Greg Aldering wrote:
>> a) I'm still not certain that we have clearly described what we
>> mean by no trend in E(B-V) with redshift. In the E(B-V) versus
>> redshift plot there is a trend with redshift. So, we should not
>> say there is no trend with redshift. What we are saying is that
>> there is no trend of the locus of blue E(B-V) values with
>> redshift, and that the location of that locus is not too blue,
>> as it was in the Riess 98 paper. I sent some language to you
>> earlier that tried to clarify this point in the abstract and
>> the figure caption, but I'm pretty sure that some of the
>> mention of "no trend" is still in the current text.
>
>Where is the mention? I do not think there is a mention of "no trend"
>in the text right now. If it is, I'm not seeing it.
>
>-Rob
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 09 2003 - 18:39:11 PDT