From: Tony Spadafora (ALSpadafora@lbl.gov)
Date: Thu May 22 2003 - 11:23:48 PDT
Rob,
quick comment on SC4:
p.3 - in new (Sullivan) paragraph:
This sentence in not clear to me. What does "leading to the conclusion
of dark energy"
mean? is the point that extinction can't explain the data and dark
energy is needed? Suggest reworking this.
Sullivan
et al. (2003) do not detect a systematic difference
in the magnitudes of high-redshift supernovae in
early- and late-type galaxies that is large enough
to allow for dust extinction as a primary contaminant
leading to the conclusion of dark energy,
as had been suggested previously (e.g., Rowan-
Robinson 2002).
-- Tony Spadafora ALSpadafora@lbl.gov Physics Division Tel: (510) 495-2316 Lawrence Berkeley National Lab FAX: (510) 486-6738 1 Cyclotron Road BLDG 50R5032 Berkeley, CA 94720-8160
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 22 2003 - 11:23:49 PDT