clarification

From: Ariel Goobar (ariel@physto.se)
Date: Wed May 21 2003 - 00:52:08 PDT

  • Next message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Re: comments on SC3"

    Rob,
    just to make sure you understand what I think is problematic with
    the current draft: this whole paper is trying to do a betterjpb
    on SN colors than we've done in the past. You have gone further
    than anyone before in being careful and pointing out all the potential
    pitfalls. It would be a shame if this is clouded by too drastic statements
    on things we cannot safely quantify. Thus, I suggest that instead
    of talking about "4 clearly reddened SNe" we talk about "likely
    reddened", and, we use the argument (when true!) that it is
    a conservative approach to treat them as reddened. Same thing
    for the "extreme outliers" in the Jha sample. The only thing I
    am after is a more cautious description of the analysis. I think
    is an attitude that will also help in having a smooth refereeing
    process.
    Ariel

    -- 
    ___________________________________________________________________
    Ariel Goobar (www.physto.se/~ariel)
    Department of Physics, Stockholm University
    AlbaNova University Center, SE-106 91 Stockholm, SWEDEN
    tel: +46 8 55378659 fax: +46 8 55378601 
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed May 21 2003 - 00:52:11 PDT