Re: stability fits redux

From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Tue May 20 2003 - 15:36:24 PDT

Next message: Alex Conley: "Re: stability fits redux"

Previous message: Alex Conley: "stability fits redux"
In reply to: Alex Conley: "stability fits redux"
Next in thread: Alex Conley: "Re: stability fits redux"
Reply: Alex Conley: "Re: stability fits redux"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 03:10:52PM -0700, Alex Conley wrote:
> I think we could use this as a formal critereon: If it was found that
> changing the initial conditions of the fit produced more than one solution
> with similar chisquare but fit parameters that varied by more than x sigma
> (where x could be 5 or more), the supernova was excluded. This would
> eliminate only 97aj from the currently existing 42 sample.

What is 97aj's other name?

-Rob

-- 
--Prof. Robert Knop
  Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
  robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu

Next message: Alex Conley: "Re: stability fits redux"
Previous message: Alex Conley: "stability fits redux"
In reply to: Alex Conley: "stability fits redux"
Next in thread: Alex Conley: "Re: stability fits redux"
Reply: Alex Conley: "Re: stability fits redux"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 20 2003 - 15:36:26 PDT