From: Rahman Amanullah (rahman@physto.se)
Date: Mon May 05 2003 - 11:27:13 PDT
On Sat, 3 May 2003, Greg Aldering wrote:
> Also, given that you set Omega MACHO to 20% of OM, would the size of the
> bias shrink by roughly 2/3's if you modeled an OM=0.21 universe, i.e.,
> to match our observations? This would reduce the bias on w to about
> 0.05. Also, as you know, the w sensitivity can change a lot depending on
> how the other parameters are set.
We did the same simulations but with an OM=0.21 universe instead and the
result was:
<w> = -0.96 +/- 0.0550 <\Omega_M> = 0.1778 +/- 0.0285
so the bias was reduced to 0.04 as you more or less predicted. These
results were obtained from a three parameter fit (\Omega_M, w, \scriptM),
treating \scriptM as a nuisance parameter and assuming a flat universe. No
priors were applied.
Cheers,
Rahman
__________________________________________________________
Rahman Amanullah, +46 8 553 786 61
Stockholm University ICQ: 62860758
Stockholm Centre for Physics, 17d 50m E
Astronomy & Biotechnology 59d 26m N
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 05 2003 - 11:27:25 PDT