Re: Some more on GL systematics.

From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Sat May 03 2003 - 11:37:30 PDT

  • Next message: Alex Kim: "More on dust evolution"

    On Sat, May 03, 2003 at 11:34:58AM -0700, Greg Aldering wrote:
    >
    > Hi Ariel and Rahman,
    >
    > I have a few questions related to these GL simulations. First, the values
    > you give below are the shifts for the SN data by themselves, right? If the
    > w and OM shifts are correlated, then probably the priors from CMB and
    > 2dFGRS will limit the overall effect. Has this been included? Since the w
    > value we quote includes the other priors, they have to be considered
    > somehow in calculating a systematic uncertainty on that value of w. Since,
    > as Rob has noted, the GL effects might be the largest of all the
    > systematics, the w systematics error might be set by your treatment.

    Excellent point.

    Do you guys have probability arrays (before and after) which you can
    send me? If so, I can cross those through the same prior I'm using for
    everything else.

    -Rob

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 03 2003 - 11:37:31 PDT