From: Greg Aldering (aldering@panisse.lbl.gov)
Date: Fri May 02 2003 - 09:01:13 PDT
Hi Rob,
Nowhere do we say anything about the values of the constraints we use
either from 2dFGRS or WMAP. This should get fixed up in the
paragraph "Other methods provide ..." on p 22. We should note that the
CMB constraints are from the "WMAPext" sample, which includes other CMB
experiments.
Here are the rest of my edits
p29: I think that Hoflich is supposed to have an umlaut over the "o"
(In other places I've seen his name spelled Hoeflich - maybe
Andy or Lifan know the correct spelling.)
I suggest a new paragraph starting at "At low-redshift ..." just
to give the reader a break.
checkit box: Just site the CMAGIC paper, as follows:
"... (including some from the R99 data), ..." -->
"... \citep{wang03}, ..."
"... SNe~Ia of strongly ..." --->
"... SNe~Ia strongly ..."
"consistancy" ---> "consistency"
several cases of "stretch/luminosity" which should be "stretch-luminosity"
"... this smaller than ..." --->
"... this is smaller than ..."
Table 9: check that change in w is only 0.01 for intrinsic U-B
since text says 0.10
Table 9: Will the read understand that the values listed under, i.e.,
"w" refer to errors and not parameter values? Maybe you want
to put "Systematic on" above the three parameter columns.
Eric adds after "...with a flat universe cosmology."
"equivalent to a shift along $w$ contour" but I'm not sure what
he was suggesting.
"WPFC2" ---> "WFPC2" (you probably fixed these by now)
I noticed that the "Comparison with Other Measurements" section is
gone. I just want to check on whether that was intentional or
accidental.
"... correction host-galaxy ..." --->
"... correction of host-galaxy ..."
"... assumption of a flat universe, ..." --->
"... assumption of a flat, $\Lambda$ universe, ..."
p31: Fig 10 caption is says there are dash contours (I think Tony found this 2)
p32: Fig 9 caption:
"Stretch/Luminosity" ---> "Stretch-Luminosity"
"... the best fit values ..." ---> "... the best-fit values ..."
Add at the end
"Note in particular that our HST SNe~Ia all have low-redshift counterparts"
"... galaxy two-point correlation data ..." --->
"... galaxy redshift distortion measurement ..."
fix +/- on w
In acknowledgements. "We thank Eric Linder for several helpful comments."
or something like that since he read the paper and also help sort-out
how to handle the WMAP data.
p33 Did we really observe high-z SNe with JKT??!
"... chip on WFPC2." --->
"... CCD on WFPC2."
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri May 02 2003 - 09:01:13 PDT