From: Andy Howell (DAHowell@lbl.gov)
Date: Fri Feb 28 2003 - 11:45:03 PST
It is probable that most of the "no idea" ones are Ia's. But it
wouldn't surprise me at all if one or two were not. It would be great
to see a fit without them. If the results are unchanged then we are
probably ok. If you could do this at least for our own peace of mind,
that would be great. Then we could decide whether to include it in the
paper.
-Andy
Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 05:39:53PM -0800, Andy Howell wrote:
>
>
>>Probable Ia (5): No evidence for Si, but not terrible match to Ia spectrum
>>
>>No idea (6): No spectrum, useless spectrum, or completely
>>indistinguishable from a Ib/c
>>
>>
>
>The next issue is : do we through out the "No idea" ones? They wouldn't
>be too terrible of a loss. I would assert we should keep the
>"Probables" in there with the Definites. (9733 is one of the things
>that gets thrown out in some of the cuts, if memory serves.)
>
>-Rob
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 28 2003 - 11:45:07 PST