From: Andy Howell (DAHowell@lbl.gov)
Date: Thu Feb 27 2003 - 12:45:11 PST
Rob,
Peter is supposed to sit down with me today and we will do this.
We already did this for the SNe in Reynald's paper, so we have some idea
of how it
will go, but there are many SNe in the 42 paper that were not in
Reynald's. This
means looking at the set A and D specta, notes, and circulars. So we
don't have the answers
yet, but can probably get them to you later in the day.
From that analysis, there weren't any SNe that were obviously not Ia's
from the spectra,
but there were many that we had essentially no information from the
spectrum.
We'll let you know.
-Andy
Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:
>One of the things we decided we needed during the meeting was the
>*definitive* list of supernovae from the 42SNe paper which should be
>*omitted* from further analysis. I may omit some additionally myself
>based on stretch and color cuts, but I need to know which "suspect"
>supernovae just shouldn't be used.
>
>I would be happy if by tomorrow you guys could develop a consensus on
>this matter and send the consensus to me. I will then omit those
>supernovae from all subsequent cosmological fits.
>
>-Rob
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 27 2003 - 12:45:14 PST