From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Sun Feb 27 2005 - 06:16:08 PST
Footnote 1 on page 5: the statement about how the maxima are chosen is
still a little confusing. It should be made clear that this is for the
low-redshift supernovae with high S/N, since this condition may be
violated when there is low S/N (and a noise spike pops up between the
line).
Top of page 6, second and third bullets, for clarity I would change it
to:
- A small wavelength region (to which hereafter we refer to as the
fitting region) is selected around each identified maximum, always
within the wavenegth ranges of Table 3.
- To the data extracted from both fitting regions, we fit a straight
line.
Otherwise, I think that the current description is fine. I haven't
heard back from Eric yet on whether he has any problems with the current
description.
By the way: please remember to include Eric on messages regarding this
paper.
-Rob
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 28 2005 - 10:04:23 PST